One new step in the work on our strategy’s sustainability goals in 2022 was the implementation of a double materiality assessment. To be effective in our efforts, we must be aware of what we are influencing, but also what affects us in a number of areas.
Stakeholders
Being an active part in society means that a company like Duni Group needs to not only realise our responsibilities towards others, but also being genuinely interested and curious in what is on top of their minds and what they are worried about. This goes beyond traditional stakeholder management and encourages us to be an active partner in creating common ground and shared value with our key stakeholders. We see this as a joint opportunity to create stronger societies and relationships in the long run.
Materiality assessment
In 2022, Duni Group carried out an updated materiality assessment. The idea behind it is that in order to be effective in our sustainability work, we must understand both how we affect the outside world and how it affects or may affect us in a number of areas.
To ensure that the results are still relevant, we have continuously monitored and communicated internally about the areas that were considered essential. We have also deepened our understanding of biodiversity, although it is not on the top list.
The 2022 analysis began with a document analysis and qualitative interviews with around thirty stakeholders (business partners, civil society, employees, customers, investors, NGOs, government agencies). Like the rest of our sustainability report, the materiality analysis is based on the standards established by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), where we follow the procedures in GRI 3.
We began by carefully reviewing topics reported by, among others, comparable companies and relevant non-governmental organizations. These topics were then tested in a survey with our stakeholder groups, (e.g. customers, suppliers, government agencies, employees and the Board. We asked open questions in semi-structured interviews. In these interviews other relevant topics emerged which we analyzed to identify central themes.
We then followed GRI's explanation of significance to determine our most important positive and negative impact areas. GRI has topic-specific standards for each of these areas.
Summary and matrix
The matrix we have compiled shows our material topics based on their importance. According to the GRI, this is determined by:
- Scale – good/bad impact
- Scope – how widespread the impact is
- Irremediability – whether it can be mitigated
- Likelihood – probability
We combined scale, scope and irremediability to determine how positive or negative the impact is or can be. Likelihood was used to compare actual, existing topics and potential impact. These were used in two axes in a chart to illustrate the result.
The further to the left or right from the center a topic is in the matrix, the more negative or positive it is. The actual impact is placed towards the top, the greater the impact, while any impact is more likely the closer to the bottom (Potential) it is. A topic that is close to the center of the axes is either not considered to be particularly significant or is not very likely to have a major impact. It is neither particularly negative nor positive.
Materiality analysis
- Inside-out influence
- Both ways influence
- Outside influence
Inside-out influence
Both ways influence
Outside influence
* Material topics